2010-11-15T00:00:25 well... this was not ready to be shared, but here it is: http://pastebin.com/yMk1i3hS 2010-11-15T00:00:59 your code is so much more pythonic :( 2010-11-15T00:01:04 my code looks horrible lol 2010-11-15T00:02:03 mine did not look that way on the first pass :) 2010-11-15T00:02:40 why does your code iterate only over the #of your fleets inbound 2010-11-15T00:02:44 and it could use a bit more work... but I have other problems to work on. 2010-11-15T00:02:53 line 49 2010-11-15T00:03:01 for t in xrange(1,M): 2010-11-15T00:03:19 M is max_turn 2010-11-15T00:03:26 junk, mine, enemy = fleets 2010-11-15T00:03:27 M = len(mine) 2010-11-15T00:03:29 nope 2010-11-15T00:03:31 M is the number of turns to calculate. the fleets arrays are just the total numbers arriving on each turn. 2010-11-15T00:03:42 nope? 2010-11-15T00:03:43 so, yes, it is the max turn. 2010-11-15T00:03:47 hmm 2010-11-15T00:03:47 see :) 2010-11-15T00:03:50 i am confused 2010-11-15T00:04:04 mine comes from: make_empty_arrays 2010-11-15T00:04:05 total # of fleets arriving? 2010-11-15T00:04:11 if there are no fleets coming in, mine is [0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0] 2010-11-15T00:04:16 ooh 2010-11-15T00:04:27 it's not the clearest thing in the world :) 2010-11-15T00:04:31 <---should read the full code 2010-11-15T00:04:31 nm 2010-11-15T00:04:33 noooo... its not... 2010-11-15T00:04:39 the clearest. 2010-11-15T00:05:14 I wasn't expecting to share any of it so soon... that's my excuse for the lack of explanation 2010-11-15T00:05:18 :/ 2010-11-15T00:05:26 heh 2010-11-15T00:05:37 I only knew because the it was implicit in the structure of fleets 2010-11-15T00:05:41 *guessed 2010-11-15T00:05:48 i leave a lot of comments around, cause otherwise i forget why i did something:-\ 2010-11-15T00:05:52 I don't think it is explicit in the code 2010-11-15T00:06:34 bhasker: good plan. I always end up re-solving things. This has been in my code since the start though, so I remember it now. 2010-11-15T00:06:49 heh 2010-11-15T00:07:01 I leave comments around which go out of date :D 2010-11-15T00:07:14 and i added like a ton of logging because i would keep running into bugs: -\ 2010-11-15T00:07:37 the end result of the run planet function is a list like this [(0,1,0), (1,1,13), ....] 2010-11-15T00:07:50 the first term is _always_ (0, current_owner, 0) 2010-11-15T00:08:05 btw, what is junk? 2010-11-15T00:08:06 it made some of my other code easier, where I subtract the number of ships on turn N from turn N-1 2010-11-15T00:08:06 hmm k 2010-11-15T00:08:35 junk is just so I don't think I am going to use it. the value happens to be [0], which is a list of incoming neutral fleets :) 2010-11-15T00:08:49 :P 2010-11-15T00:09:08 my other favorite in python code is to do stuff like: ign,ore,x = f(y) 2010-11-15T00:09:18 haha 2010-11-15T00:09:32 it's hard to not end up with out of date comments 2010-11-15T00:09:35 sigh: have you used pythong much? 2010-11-15T00:09:36 i try to comment sparingly 2010-11-15T00:10:00 dmj111: a bit, it's my go to language most of the time 2010-11-15T00:10:22 excellent... the next thing will make more sense then... 2010-11-15T00:10:41 I did this : ig,no,re,x = ... in some code where I was using regular expressions. 2010-11-15T00:10:45 import re 2010-11-15T00:10:53 stuff quit working in the loop. 2010-11-15T00:10:59 :) 2010-11-15T00:11:06 that's always fun 2010-11-15T00:11:32 "oops" 2010-11-15T00:11:40 ok. everyone have a good day/night. I didn't mean to stay up this long again. 2010-11-15T00:11:42 I've done something similar before, I think 2010-11-15T00:11:44 easy mistake to make 2010-11-15T00:11:45 cya 2010-11-15T00:11:50 later. 2010-11-15T00:13:00 l8r 2010-11-15T00:13:04 thanks for sharing your code 2010-11-15T00:15:24 McLeopold: all your testmaps seem to only have one "central planet"? 2010-11-15T00:16:10 *** delt0r___ has joined #aichallenge 2010-11-15T00:17:14 Top 10 players: bocsimacko(3789), Raschi(3756), sajmon(3558), asavis(3555), SUA.khb(3541), _iouri_(3538), bix0r4ever(3537), shangas(3535), george(3524), dmj111(3517) 2010-11-15T00:18:24 *** delt0r has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 276 seconds) 2010-11-15T00:55:51 hmm 2010-11-15T00:56:01 so looks like objects in python are very inefficient 2010-11-15T00:56:04 *** Mathnerd314 has quit IRC (Quit: ChatZilla 0.9.86-rdmsoft [XULRunner 1.9.2.12/20101026210630]) 2010-11-15T00:56:10 when i represent my state as a straight tuple 2010-11-15T00:56:25 the copy time goes down from 7ms to 0.68ms 2010-11-15T00:56:27 :-\ 2010-11-15T00:57:17 http://pastebin.com/BX9EnNmF 2010-11-15T00:57:23 for anyone who is interested 2010-11-15T01:00:10 i just let c++ write my copy functions 2010-11-15T01:00:12 is that a bad idea? 2010-11-15T01:01:02 *** Mjothvitnir has quit IRC (Quit: Page closed) 2010-11-15T01:01:43 antimatroid: as long as you understand what the copy function is actually doing, sure 2010-11-15T01:03:22 copy function in c++ for most structures i bit by bit copy 2010-11-15T01:03:26 unless you have pointers in there 2010-11-15T01:03:32 in which case you want to write copy constructors 2010-11-15T01:03:42 in python its not as simple 2010-11-15T01:03:54 because everything is a reference 2010-11-15T01:04:37 I find python copy simpler to get my head around, mostly because everything behaves the same way 2010-11-15T01:05:02 i guess python is just slower 2010-11-15T01:05:07 i wrote a similar c++ code 2010-11-15T01:05:14 and it runs in under 500 microseconds:- 2010-11-15T01:05:29 well, yeah... python has a lot more overhead 2010-11-15T01:05:54 the tuple version of python is close 2010-11-15T01:05:59 but the object version is very slow 2010-11-15T01:06:41 well, in the first place objects are like one big hash 2010-11-15T01:06:45 so you have that overhead 2010-11-15T01:07:01 yea i guess, but i didnt realize how much slower object copy was compared to tuples 2010-11-15T01:07:13 i didn't want to use a tuple cause then i have to index everything by number 2010-11-15T01:07:19 and thats kind of annoying to read later 2010-11-15T01:07:29 so i used an object as the container 2010-11-15T01:07:45 thinking c++ 2010-11-15T01:07:55 since in c++ all the lookup overhead is optimized away i guess 2010-11-15T01:08:07 but in python one pays the lookup overhead everytime 2010-11-15T01:08:24 so ... the object version turns out to be a lot more crappier than i expected 2010-11-15T01:08:37 python you can't assume the lookups don't change 2010-11-15T01:08:43 yea 2010-11-15T01:08:49 c++ most things are fixed at compile time 2010-11-15T01:08:56 i understand the reason now once i thought about it a bit more 2010-11-15T01:09:03 and that's why i like c++ 2010-11-15T01:09:08 cause i have no idea about any of that stuff 2010-11-15T01:09:12 c++ just works fast for me 2010-11-15T01:09:12 haha 2010-11-15T01:09:23 antimatroid :) python gives the flexibility 2010-11-15T01:09:30 you just need to understand what is the cost you pay for it 2010-11-15T01:09:31 c++ is very flexible i find 2010-11-15T01:09:36 fast really depends on what you are measuring 2010-11-15T01:09:42 there are very few things i can't do, and i expect python doesn 2010-11-15T01:09:44 t do them either 2010-11-15T01:09:53 since my experience is limited with python i don't understand the cost for everything 2010-11-15T01:10:01 sigh: any measurement is relative 2010-11-15T01:10:02 python == less development time 2010-11-15T01:10:07 so good for prototyping 2010-11-15T01:10:25 when you need raw compute speed c/c++ will always do better 2010-11-15T01:10:26 i think i'm going to learn haskell after the contest 2010-11-15T01:10:38 everyone seems to love higher level languages, and i think that'd be my one 2010-11-15T01:10:48 antimatroid c++ has its place 2010-11-15T01:10:50 and pythong its 2010-11-15T01:10:58 you just need to know what tool to use for what 2010-11-15T01:11:05 and have to do things a bit differently 2010-11-15T01:11:08 like i just learnt 2010-11-15T01:11:17 bhasker: i'm not even really a programmer, i'm more a maths and economics student than anything 2010-11-15T01:11:19 a c++ programmer will just stick the variables in a class and be done with it 2010-11-15T01:11:40 a python programmer would probably have used a tuple 2010-11-15T01:11:42 like dmj did 2010-11-15T01:11:53 <-- being a c++ programmer i stuck stuff into an object 2010-11-15T01:11:55 which makes these contests much more appealing than codejam etc. where it's more about my strategy than problem matching skills 2010-11-15T01:12:04 heh 2010-11-15T01:12:05 bhasker: I would have stuck it into an object 2010-11-15T01:12:17 only would have switched to tuple it if was too slow 2010-11-15T01:12:30 yea as i am realizing object is sloooooow 2010-11-15T01:12:32 like 10x slow 2010-11-15T01:12:35 pretty much what you did, except I would have optimised other stuff first 2010-11-15T01:12:44 yea i did the same 2010-11-15T01:12:54 like not calculating the state unless required 2010-11-15T01:12:55 except now that i got to this point where most of my time is in updateState 2010-11-15T01:13:15 well the reason i calculated them 2010-11-15T01:13:31 was it makes it easier to calculate stuff like new ships per turn per planet etc 2010-11-15T01:13:37 if i want to resolve for a lot of turns into future 2010-11-15T01:13:56 and another thing i am realizing is accessor functions are horrible in python 2010-11-15T01:14:09 the overhead of function calls for accessors is too high 2010-11-15T01:14:17 yeah, i need future states to know what i can send at each time point 2010-11-15T01:14:29 i couldn't do incremental calculation of that 2010-11-15T01:14:37 yea and its complicated to do it 2010-11-15T01:14:39 on the fly 2010-11-15T01:14:45 i would probably write a buggy version of it 2010-11-15T01:14:47 if i did it 2010-11-15T01:14:54 not really, write an indexing function, and have the code in there 2010-11-15T01:14:59 if not generated, generate, then index 2010-11-15T01:15:05 these guys are killing me: http://ai-contest.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=1094&start=20#p7295 2010-11-15T01:16:21 *** mega1 has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 245 seconds) 2010-11-15T01:16:25 you seem to have responded appropriately 2010-11-15T01:16:48 i don't understand why people are bitching 2010-11-15T01:17:00 if your bot doesn't really take into account symmetry 2010-11-15T01:17:06 it shouldn't really do much worse 2010-11-15T01:17:15 Top 10 players: bocsimacko(3789), Raschi(3692), bix0r4ever(3562), sajmon(3550), luksian(3535), shangas(3529), dmj111(3524), Mangara(3521), george(3517), _iouri_(3490) 2010-11-15T01:17:15 and if it does, you made assumptions 2010-11-15T01:17:17 and mine seems to be doing aobut the same 2010-11-15T01:17:21 its not worse 2010-11-15T01:17:23 the map generator was not part of the spec 2010-11-15T01:17:29 bhasker: it MIGHT, unknowingly! 2010-11-15T01:17:44 bhasker: you know.. wifi might kill you too! 2010-11-15T01:17:47 amstan: bocsimackos bot isn't doing as well though 2010-11-15T01:17:54 it lost to someone with a rank over 600 before 2010-11-15T01:17:59 i'm worried about that now 2010-11-15T01:18:11 just shows that his bot isnt perfect? 2010-11-15T01:18:14 meh, rather have people playing the game, rather than the map 2010-11-15T01:18:20 http://ai-contest.com/visualizer.php?game_id=7356348 2010-11-15T01:18:22 i don't see how it reflects anything about the map itself 2010-11-15T01:18:53 he picked bad start planets 2010-11-15T01:18:58 not sure why you think he should have won that 2010-11-15T01:19:03 sigh: i agree, although it probably could ahve been made more clear that the map generator was in no way official 2010-11-15T01:19:19 i'm referring to the difference in ranking, not his choice of moves 2010-11-15T01:19:29 yeah, I agree with that 2010-11-15T01:19:35 how does that matter he lost because he made a bad move 2010-11-15T01:19:39 the ranking is immaterial 2010-11-15T01:19:42 difference in ranking is a result of choice of moves :P 2010-11-15T01:19:57 just one map on which he made a bad move 2010-11-15T01:20:09 probably something to fix in his bot's first turn logic 2010-11-15T01:20:17 to not ignore some good planets 2010-11-15T01:20:18 nearby 2010-11-15T01:20:29 i think he has some code to avoid any planet that can be contested 2010-11-15T01:20:36 and i see that his bot does that on most maps 2010-11-15T01:20:56 on turn 1 he always goes for safe planets only 2010-11-15T01:21:21 'can be contested' means, is snipable? 2010-11-15T01:21:30 kind of 2010-11-15T01:21:39 mostly planets that can be reinforced by him 2010-11-15T01:21:44 faster than they can be attacked by enemy 2010-11-15T01:21:47 so planets close by to him 2010-11-15T01:21:50 or behind his primary planet 2010-11-15T01:22:04 he never goes for contestable planets on turn one on most maps 2010-11-15T01:22:17 anything in the middle/near middle is usually offlimits for his bots 2010-11-15T01:22:53 as far as i can tell, there aren't any huge changes though, and crashes don't seem to be much of an issue near the top 2010-11-15T01:23:06 so it went reasonbly smoothly so far 2010-11-15T01:23:40 I'm glad there was a change, hopefully people will make more robust bots 2010-11-15T01:23:46 there are two changes that need making to the map generator though 2010-11-15T01:24:00 i've always been making mine robustly 2010-11-15T01:24:07 that's why i would have felt ripped off if they didn't change 2010-11-15T01:24:14 heh 2010-11-15T01:25:23 what would be interesting is if no planets were snipable on the first turn, and all middle neutrals started with ships <= its growth 2010-11-15T01:25:38 that would make for really interesting maps actually, we should get some of those on mcleopolds server 2010-11-15T01:25:58 that would be interesting 2010-11-15T01:26:16 *** hellman has joined #aichallenge 2010-11-15T01:26:35 oh god that'd be crazy aha 2010-11-15T01:27:36 alright, i'm making some of them, shouldn't be too hard 2010-11-15T01:27:37 *** amriedle has quit IRC (Quit: Lost terminal) 2010-11-15T01:28:41 bots that go for everything will probably win that map 2010-11-15T01:28:48 conservative bots will probably lose 2010-11-15T01:28:55 nope, then you'd be snipable 2010-11-15T01:29:02 not really 2010-11-15T01:29:06 yes really 2010-11-15T01:29:07 if planet cost is below growth 2010-11-15T01:29:14 then you always gain 2010-11-15T01:29:16 non-spipable means you can defend it with all your might 2010-11-15T01:29:19 by taking it 2010-11-15T01:29:23 and holding for even one turn 2010-11-15T01:29:26 so enemy has to burn more ships 2010-11-15T01:29:29 but if you take two, you don't have all your might 2010-11-15T01:29:31 than what you did to take it 2010-11-15T01:29:58 so conservative bots will be behind if they didnt take the planet on the first turn 2010-11-15T01:30:12 yes, but if you took 4 planets 2010-11-15T01:30:17 the other bot might then own you 2010-11-15T01:30:20 k let me think hold on 2010-11-15T01:30:32 if there were 20 planets of 5 growth each 2010-11-15T01:30:39 and costing 3 2010-11-15T01:30:45 i could take all of them with 4 ships 2010-11-15T01:30:47 each 2010-11-15T01:30:53 and have 20 in reserve 2010-11-15T01:30:56 now enemy counters 2010-11-15T01:31:07 he has to send at least 6 to each planet 2010-11-15T01:31:15 my growth will outpace him 2010-11-15T01:31:26 i will hold more planets than he does 2010-11-15T01:32:24 at least if i am not wrong conservative bots should lose in such situations 2010-11-15T01:33:28 argh, there is a terrible error in the map generator 2010-11-15T01:33:37 well, not breaking anything, but really stupid 2010-11-15T01:33:57 *** sigh has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 276 seconds) 2010-11-15T01:34:18 oh wait, no there's not, i'm not used to having one line of code over 2 lines 2010-11-15T01:42:12 heh 2010-11-15T01:45:30 so do you always start on a 5growth, with 100units? 2010-11-15T01:49:45 *** Rubicon-|-Cross has joined #aichallenge 2010-11-15T01:53:16 yes 2010-11-15T01:59:42 *** bhasker has quit IRC (Quit: bhasker) 2010-11-15T02:07:02 *** narnach has quit IRC (Quit: Leaving.) 2010-11-15T02:15:14 *** virdo has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 265 seconds) 2010-11-15T02:17:16 Top 10 players: bocsimacko(3783), Raschi(3635), protocolocon(3552), bix0r4ever(3549), dmj111(3525), sajmon(3525), luksian(3523), shangas(3516), _iouri_(3513), george(3502) 2010-11-15T02:35:01 *** medrimonia has joined #aichallenge 2010-11-15T02:35:10 Hello 2010-11-15T02:36:51 hi 2010-11-15T02:44:23 Does anyone have crash/timeout/invalid order issues only with the new maps too? 2010-11-15T02:44:50 add moar debugging? 2010-11-15T02:45:14 that's a very broad error 2010-11-15T02:45:29 In fact I'm debugging it on the new tcp server, but it hasn't crashed yet. 2010-11-15T03:01:05 *** jaspervdj has joined #aichallenge 2010-11-15T03:02:20 *** Arthur has joined #aichallenge 2010-11-15T03:03:58 *** Arthur has joined #aichallenge 2010-11-15T03:06:12 *** Arthur has quit IRC (Client Quit) 2010-11-15T03:17:15 Top 10 players: bix0r4ever(3820), bocsimacko(3762), protocolocon(3609), Raschi(3565), dmj111(3527), _iouri_(3524), george(3507), luksian(3506), shangas(3505), sajmon(3497) 2010-11-15T03:21:52 medrimonia: any idea what your problems are? 2010-11-15T03:22:11 i pretty much wrote the generator so i know what the maps are like 2010-11-15T03:22:40 this post http://ai-contest.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=1094&sid=116bd16a3a09b560954fe39a1fdd5fe1&start=0 contains accurate information too 2010-11-15T03:23:16 *** Migi32 has joined #aichallenge 2010-11-15T03:26:10 *** sigh has joined #aichallenge 2010-11-15T03:29:59 I've found it! 2010-11-15T03:30:13 what was it? 2010-11-15T03:30:21 In fact I've an ID for the central planet 2010-11-15T03:30:40 there are possibly more than "one" central planets now 2010-11-15T03:30:49 *** tapwater has quit IRC (Quit: tapwater) 2010-11-15T03:30:58 And the central planet was the planete "exactly" between my home and enemy home 2010-11-15T03:31:21 that's no longer required for line symmetric maps :) 2010-11-15T03:31:30 And with the new map generator, my bot couldn't find it -> error 2010-11-15T03:31:52 how do you like the new maps? 2010-11-15T03:32:05 the gameplay is often a lot more interesting 2010-11-15T03:33:13 I find it interesting and I think it will need a couple of modification to my bot 2010-11-15T03:34:14 Because I was often making reference to the central planet 2010-11-15T03:34:50 *** shades has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 255 seconds) 2010-11-15T03:37:11 With the new generator, can we assume that the planet with the id of 0 will be one of the centrals planets antimatroid? 2010-11-15T03:40:23 medrimonia: planet 0 is always at 14,14 2010-11-15T03:40:34 actually, that will be 17,17 at some point 2010-11-15T03:40:39 Thanks a lot 2010-11-15T03:40:44 gah, don't listen to that 2010-11-15T03:41:11 That's easier to make a quick patch to avoid the crashes on official server 2010-11-15T03:41:29 it's currently at (14,14), that will change to (19,19), the maps are generated inside a circle centred around the origin then translated such that all coordinates are positive (for the visualiser) 2010-11-15T03:41:57 the old max distance was 34, which got reduced to 24 by mistake, but that will change again 2010-11-15T03:42:55 And now the minimal distance between the two homes planet is 4 right? 2010-11-15T03:43:12 http://code.google.com/p/ai-contest/source/browse/trunk/planet_wars/backend/map_generator.py 2010-11-15T03:43:12 that's the current map generator, 2 changes WILL be made, maxRadius will be 17 and a line needs to change when selecting ship counts for one lot of neutrals, but that's not really important 2010-11-15T03:43:19 it always was :) 2010-11-15T03:43:42 it was just possible for it to be less with line symmetric maps, but the maps get a lot more drawy as the players starting angles get closer 2010-11-15T03:44:08 Really? I've played on maps were the distance was 1 or 2 on the TCP server 2010-11-15T03:45:43 not possible 2010-11-15T03:45:52 they had to start on opposite sides of the centre planet 2010-11-15T03:46:07 it had to be at least 2 with min dist of 1, and min dist is officially set at 2 2010-11-15T03:46:15 so it couldn't possibly be below 4 under those restrictions 2010-11-15T03:47:42 I might be wrong. 2010-11-15T03:48:57 there is a way actually 2010-11-15T03:49:28 you could have (0,0) (0, 0.5) (0, 1.0) etc. 2010-11-15T03:49:31 but that wont happen anymore 2010-11-15T03:50:39 I think that's really good, the games will be more differents and the bots have to be less specific 2010-11-15T03:52:03 that's the idea 2010-11-15T03:52:09 the map generator was always meant to change 2010-11-15T03:52:16 possible earlier, but nothing had ever been set 2010-11-15T03:54:24 But, nothing more will change between now and the deadline? 2010-11-15T03:54:31 unlikely 2010-11-15T03:54:57 if anything, only more restrictions on what the map must meet in order to be counted as "valid" 2010-11-15T03:55:00 Cool because hotfixing during the last week would be hard 2010-11-15T03:57:55 *** shades has joined #aichallenge 2010-11-15T03:58:03 *** Rubicon-|-Cross has quit IRC (Quit: Leaving) 2010-11-15T03:59:13 Thanks for all the informations and see you later 2010-11-15T03:59:26 *** medrimonia has quit IRC () 2010-11-15T04:04:15 *** shades has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 255 seconds) 2010-11-15T04:15:34 *** wvdschel has joined #aichallenge 2010-11-15T04:15:34 *** wvdschel has joined #aichallenge 2010-11-15T04:17:17 Top 10 players: bocsimacko(3768), bix0r4ever(3680), protocolocon(3665), Mangara(3558), _iouri_(3549), Raschi(3549), luksian(3538), dmj111(3523), george(3512), shangas(3510) 2010-11-15T04:17:38 *** hellman has quit IRC (Remote host closed the connection) 2010-11-15T04:19:17 *** shades has joined #aichallenge 2010-11-15T05:09:09 *** Frontier has joined #aichallenge 2010-11-15T05:09:43 *** perror has joined #aichallenge 2010-11-15T05:16:24 *** phreeza has joined #aichallenge 2010-11-15T05:17:18 Top 10 players: bocsimacko(3762), bix0r4ever(3712), protocolocon(3630), Mangara(3573), _iouri_(3547), Raschi(3527), dmj111(3510), shangas(3508), george(3503), Xrillo(3478) 2010-11-15T05:23:32 *** Naktibalda has joined #aichallenge 2010-11-15T05:27:35 *** HangFire_ has joined #aichallenge 2010-11-15T05:28:05 Hey, can someone help me with setting up remote debug in eclipse? 2010-11-15T05:30:01 Is no one around? 2010-11-15T05:30:35 *** krokkrok has joined #aichallenge 2010-11-15T05:42:57 try #eclipse 2010-11-15T05:47:30 need new map set on TCP server 2010-11-15T05:49:47 Thanks for the tip, will check in there. 2010-11-15T05:49:55 Accoun: no one can get hold of dhartmei 2010-11-15T05:50:53 Accoun: also, the other tcp is being run off McLeopolds home connection, I think he would like it if people only ran one or two instances of their bot at a time 2010-11-15T05:51:07 it doesn't really matter yet, as you're one of the only people using it, just a heads up :) 2010-11-15T06:02:42 *** krokkrok has quit IRC (Quit: Page closed) 2010-11-15T06:10:02 antimatroid, did you try his other email address yet? 2010-11-15T06:10:31 no :P 2010-11-15T06:17:19 Top 10 players: bocsimacko(3757), protocolocon(3648), bix0r4ever(3647), medrimonia(3548), _iouri_(3540), Raschi(3512), Mangara(3509), dmj111(3499), shangas(3490), george(3488) 2010-11-15T06:21:56 *** andrei009 has joined #aichallenge 2010-11-15T06:22:18 hello 2010-11-15T06:22:51 i have a 'stupid' question ,how do i compile and run my bot if i have the c++ package ? 2010-11-15T06:23:22 I have a project file set up with codeblocks 2010-11-15T06:23:38 then i just compile the project and use the outputed .exe file for running 2010-11-15T06:23:47 http://ai-contest.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=751 2010-11-15T06:23:52 you might enjoy that viewer too :) 2010-11-15T06:24:23 ok , i will try it now 2010-11-15T06:28:28 *** p4p4 has joined #aichallenge 2010-11-15T06:37:11 hey antimatroid , how do i add mybot.cc in bot manager? when i add i have to put the full path or what? 2010-11-15T06:37:43 you don't, you compile the project to get an .exe 2010-11-15T06:37:49 then add the .exe to jbotmanager 2010-11-15T06:37:54 with the full path name 2010-11-15T06:38:27 ok 2010-11-15T06:50:19 *** narnach has joined #aichallenge 2010-11-15T06:50:19 *** narnach is now known as narnach_mb 2010-11-15T06:53:36 *** georgeSebastian has joined #aichallenge 2010-11-15T07:00:53 *** jaspervdj has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 245 seconds) 2010-11-15T07:11:26 *** andrei009 has quit IRC (Quit: Page closed) 2010-11-15T07:15:07 *** georgeSebastian has quit IRC (Read error: Connection reset by peer) 2010-11-15T07:17:18 Top 10 players: bocsimacko(3751), bix0r4ever(3740), protocolocon(3673), luksian(3612), Mangara(3545), _iouri_(3537), Raschi(3535), dmj111(3504), shangas(3490), george(3486) 2010-11-15T07:21:31 McLeopold: almost beaten by my rage bot variant :P 2010-11-15T07:45:49 *** iNtERrUpT has joined #aichallenge 2010-11-15T07:46:59 *** sigh has quit IRC (Remote host closed the connection) 2010-11-15T07:48:13 *** sigh has joined #aichallenge 2010-11-15T08:03:47 http://www.teagames.com/games/topdog/play.php something like that would make for a cool ai contest 2010-11-15T08:04:39 *** Rubicon-|-Cross has joined #aichallenge 2010-11-15T08:17:14 *** delt0r has joined #aichallenge 2010-11-15T08:17:20 Top 10 players: bocsimacko(3776), bix0r4ever(3760), protocolocon(3661), Mangara(3564), jambachili(3556), _iouri_(3535), Raschi(3524), dmj111(3523), shangas(3489), george(3484) 2010-11-15T08:17:33 *** delt0r___ has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) 2010-11-15T08:18:03 *** iNtERrUpT has quit IRC (Remote host closed the connection) 2010-11-15T08:37:08 *** lavalamp_ has quit IRC (Quit: Page closed) 2010-11-15T08:42:10 *** iNtERrUpT has joined #aichallenge 2010-11-15T08:47:08 @rankings 2010-11-15T08:47:10 antimatroid: Top 10 players: bix0r4ever(3778), bocsimacko(3776), protocolocon(3644), Mangara(3591), _iouri_(3545), jambachili(3543), dmj111(3529), Raschi(3511), shangas(3490), luksian(3485) 2010-11-15T08:47:26 god damn java bot too 2010-11-15T08:57:47 *** bhasker has joined #aichallenge 2010-11-15T09:14:45 *** hellman has joined #aichallenge 2010-11-15T09:17:19 Top 10 players: bocsimacko(3780), bix0r4ever(3745), protocolocon(3635), Mangara(3599), _iouri_(3539), dmj111(3535), luksian(3524), jambachili(3523), shangas(3489), george(3479) 2010-11-15T09:24:48 antimatroid: a game like that would be cool but that implementation is retarded 2010-11-15T09:25:21 the turn rate seems to be a step function of your airspeed or something 2010-11-15T09:26:48 also, good job on the maps. totally messed up my concept for the bot i was working on but it does make them more interesting 2010-11-15T09:35:33 *** iNtERrUpT has quit IRC (Remote host closed the connection) 2010-11-15T09:52:01 *** fawek has joined #aichallenge 2010-11-15T10:06:51 *** JamesMG has joined #aichallenge 2010-11-15T10:17:21 Top 10 players: bocsimacko(3798), bix0r4ever(3689), Raschi(3640), luksian(3613), protocolocon(3595), Mangara(3565), _iouri_(3557), dmj111(3543), shangas(3494), george(3490) 2010-11-15T10:23:05 *** Ari2 has quit IRC (Remote host closed the connection) 2010-11-15T10:32:51 *** superflit has quit IRC (Quit: superflit) 2010-11-15T10:33:05 *** p4p4 has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) 2010-11-15T10:35:07 *** Palmik has joined #aichallenge 2010-11-15T10:49:55 *** lavalamp_ has joined #aichallenge 2010-11-15T10:52:34 *** davidd is now known as europeanswallow 2010-11-15T10:54:04 *** narnach_mb has quit IRC (Quit: Leaving.) 2010-11-15T10:57:04 *** fawek has quit IRC (Remote host closed the connection) 2010-11-15T11:01:58 *** krokkrok has joined #aichallenge 2010-11-15T11:05:55 *** rebelxt has joined #aichallenge 2010-11-15T11:08:34 *** europeanswallow is now known as davidd 2010-11-15T11:14:57 *** superflit has joined #aichallenge 2010-11-15T11:16:35 *** p4p4 has joined #aichallenge 2010-11-15T11:17:22 Top 10 players: bocsimacko(3810), bix0r4ever(3668), protocolocon(3588), Raschi(3578), _iouri_(3576), Mangara(3561), dmj111(3531), luksian(3500), shangas(3487), george(3481) 2010-11-15T11:19:31 *** McLeopold has quit IRC (Quit: Leaving) 2010-11-15T11:29:02